Dorcas Eatch reported for SAR for Ullapool Sea Savers.
Article 10 ECHR protects these pages. I have felt fear, alarm, very distressed, harassed and hounded over the last ten years. By the repeated SM hate attacks on me as stated in the pages here. And by the interference in my private life especially going through uterine cancer treatment and operations.
At no time have I criticised nor wished malice nor ill will on. Nor been abusive or threatening to Ullapool Sea Savers, Janis Piggott, her achievements, her expertise, her family, or her business.
This was purely a SAR. Because Ullapool Sea Savers and Shearwater Cruises hold photos and data they shouldn’t have about me. As I have never done business with them thereby breaking data protection.
They also used these to conduct a smear campaign inciting hate against me in the Highlands. Against the remits of both organisations and raises questions about any funding they are given.
Reported to police for SAR
Dorcas Eatch reported police for SAR on Ullapool Sea Savers. Requesting a SAR is not a criminal offence nor should it involve police.
Again Police Scotland did not talk to me about any of this.
A SAR is a request made by or on behalf of an individual. For the information which they are entitled to ask for under Article 15 of the UK GDPR. And is usually confidential between parties not for social media public posts.
This is a public post btw by Janis Piggott. Note she says she has not had interaction with me. Which is what I’ve said also. Yet they then said I was harassing and abusing kids I’ve never met.
I have never met any of them nor threatened them. But even then they used the word stalker. In every post using misinformation and lies for their smear campaigns against me.
Reported for SAR
They describe the request for a SAR abusive, harassing, and threatening. And call me a stalker purely for requesting a SAR. Dorcas Eatch reported to police for SAR.
As you know SARs have sequences that you go through. And everyone usually understands this. These are simple business requests.
What is a Subject Access Request?
A SAR is a legal right under data protection laws (like the UK GDPR). It allows individuals to ask organizations for a copy of their personal data. This includes not just the data itself, but also information about how it’s being used, where it came from, and who it’s shared with.
What is the Purpose of a SAR?
To empower individuals to understand and verify the accuracy of the data held about them. And ensure organizations are complying with data protection laws which Ullapool Seasavers and Shearwater Cruises are not.
To allow individuals to correct inaccurate data or request deletion of unnecessary data. Which I have been prevented from doing. And to prevent them doing it again with consequences. ICO also keeps records of all complaints. Dorcas Eatch reported for SAR.
Instead of keeping these confidential as you are supposed to she publicly posts for me to be reported back to her and Noel. Dorcas Eatch reported to the police for SAR.
This was when they posted my van details online.
Then the lies and misinformation under the Ullapool Sea Savers and Shearwater Cruises account.
At no point
At no point have I met Janis nor attacked her nor interfered in her life.
This was purely to do with how they were using the children’s wildlife charity account Ullapool Sea Savers. To conduct a hate campaign against me. After all this is a charity run by children for children.
At this time I was having potential cancer symptoms every day. Which prompted me to register at Ullapool medical centre for further investigation which was finally diagnosed as uterine cancer. Go back to Ullapool Sea Savers and see how my appointments to Ullapool Medical Centre were reported by Noel Hawkins as stalking charges.
At no time going to the medical centre or going about my business in Ullapool did I encounter Noel Hawkins, Janis Piggott or Ullapool Sea Savers. These are public posts.
Blatant lies
Blatant lies and I have no idea where they got this from about these fake identities see below.
They did not have them investigated to find IP address because if they had they certainly would not have been mine. These are just baseless guesses.
It’s just unbelievable what she is describing here and certainly I wouldn’t waste my time doing this.
The group though, did steal the last photo of my Dad that I had put on the RNLI in memorium page, created fake profiles, went and abused folk, made fun of dementia with that profile.
Nothing was investigated or challenged and police did not speak to me about this. Dorcas Eatch reported for SAR.
Reported for SAR
Sounds as though she was played by another person in the group just like other people were in other false allegations of impersonation against me. Again I tried to talk to the police about this but had the phone put down on me. Its all hearsay, misinformation and lies spread around Ullapool. yorkshirelandscapephotography.com/margaret-meek/
They created the fake accounts, played with the fake accounts, said it was me, got people to report the REAL me to the police. Reported to Noel even when going to the medical centre or to Boots, or Assynt, or Inverness, or Knockan Crag, or to pick up my repeat prescriptions whereupon he fabricated a stalking charge against me whilst all I was doing was having treatment for uterine cancer.
Education is the key
This post seemingly posted by the kids of Ullapool Seasavers seems not to understand the purpose of the SAR as set out above. it’s pretty clear from what they have posted on SM they have photos and data about me they shouldn’t have.
The kids are not understanding the sequence of a SAR that you can ask again if not happy with the first reply which I did but no they refused calling the sequence of the SAR “maliciously motivated”. I have never said that nor inferred it, they have deliberately inferred that not me. Educate the kids this is a normal SAR sequence not maliciously motivated.
I have not received any official notice from ICO that these posts, photos, my email address and contents of this email that was passed around have been deleted from all SM posts or any database held by Ullapool Sea Savers and the people they passed them onto.
Ico
They legally should not have any of this as I have never met them or done business with them.
Not only was Janis discussing the confidential SAR online on SM so were a lot of other people including Ruth Davey Watts and Noel Hawkins.
This screenshot (public post) is from 2022 where Noel Hawkins and Ruth Davey Watts discuss a confidential SAR between myself and Ullapool Sea Savers.
Ruth Davey Watts, a total stranger, actually rang ICO and interfered with the process of this SAR claiming incorrectly online I had been stopped from SARs ie seeing if my private data was being passed onto other people which in this example it was. She was told to stop interfering in my life in 2020 and she still stalks me to this day 2025 and plays the victim.
There was no abuse just me saying No means No Stop means stop. Further updates.
Both Hawkins and Ruth are trying to manipulate my right to access SARs to see how my private and personal data is being used, how it is passed onto other people and how they are using it.
ICO did nothing about this breach of confidentiality.
I have not been stopped from requesting SARs as it is my right to see how my data is being used.
These are the 5 involved in false allegations, fake charges, vexatious litigations, policing/monitoring, constantly reporting me to the police and COPFS – Hugh Harrop, Noel Hawkins, John Horner (geoffstarkie), Ruth Davey Watts and Helen Iliffe-Adsett.